Fortunately, the better of the two versions is what passed -- House language was used in the final version of the bill. One key element of this bill is that it removed restrictions to accessing federal gun trace data outside of one's geographic jurisdiction.
It is also worth noting another reason why it is a good thing the Senate version did not pass -- that version would have criminalized law enforcement officials who shared gun trace data in violation of the Tiahrt Amendment.
The NICS Improvement Bill (H.R.2460)
The NICS Improvement Bill (H.R. 2460) is the other key bill. This bill concerns how to ensure that records, including, but not excluded to mental health records, of prohibited purchasers go into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System in a timely way.
The NICS Improvement Bill has passed through the Senate and the House (the House voted on the bill during the week of December 17th).
Opinions about how effective this bill will be are mixed, but there are a couple of important benefits we should mention.
For example, this bill will provide a financial incentive for states to enter records of prohibited purchasers of firearms into the system. This is especially important because we know -- after the tragedy at Virginia Tech and many other tragedies -- that many of these records are not currently in the NICS system.
Because of this bill, we are likely to see a big improvement in the number of records the system maintains of people with mental health issues, and we might see some improvement in other areas as well.
The bill will also provide the possibility for veterans who were disqualified from getting firearms for mental health reasons to petition state and federal authorities to get their gun rights back. The bill is likely to affect 90,000 veterans.
At this time, we need to remember that these federal bills deserve our attention, but our best opportunity to make an impact is on the state level, not the federal level.
Finally, just a word about how gun issues are often covered in the news -- and what impact that has on the process. When we research what happens in the aftermath of gun-related tragedies, we can say that, yes, public and media response to these tragedies have had an impact. What has the most significant impact, though, is who is weighing in on gun issues. As we look to 2008, let's remember that our voices make a difference.
We will keep you updated as developments occur on these and other gun violence prevention issues. If you have any questions or would like more information, please give us a call at 312-341-0939 or 217-744-7383.
Thank you for your support and dedication to reducing gun violence.
October 4, 2007
Update on Federal Legislation
It's time to revisit and address two key federal bills related to gun control that are receiving considerable attention in Washington, D.C.
The first involves the Tiahrt Amendment, legislation that includes language severely restricting the release of information about guns traced to crime scenes. This information is contained in a firearms trace database by the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.
The second involves a bill to improve the reporting of prohibited purchasers of guns.
Both of these bills are very much up in the air at the moment. What has happened is that both chambers have developed different language for these bills. We don't know when, or how, they will be resolved.
Tiahrt Amendment
The bad news is that the Tiahrt Amendment will not be repealed this year. Nevertheless, there is certainly positive news in the continuing story of this bill. In Illinois, Republican Rep. Mark Kirk was a leader in the movement to repeal this bill, and one of the few Republicans in Congress to oppose it. In addition, key organizations in Illinois wanted to repeal the bill, including the Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police and the Illinois Fraternal Order of Police.
In Washington, the National Rifle Association supported the Tiahrt Amendment. The organization claimed that if information related to trace data became available to government agencies or the public, certain law enforcement investigations could be compromised.
Let's keep in mind - now, and for the future - that there is no evidence to show that any type of investigation conducted by law enforcement agencies that is related to the release of trace data has been compromised.
Ultimately, Tiahrt was not repealed by either chamber. However, the Senate passed a version that was worse than what we already have. Why? Because it would have authorized the criminalization of law enforcement officials who shared information related to trace data.
To that, we ask: Do we really want our law enforcement officials to receive criminal penalties for sharing information related to trace data? Of course not. We want just the opposite - to give law enforcement agencies the tools they need to help make our communities safer.
Meanwhile, the House version of this bill did feature one improvement by authorizing the sharing of trace data without geographic restrictions.
The Tiahrt Amendment is part of a Fiscal Year 2008 appropriations bill, which means this issue will have to be resolved this year.
Mental Health Records
Another key piece of federal legislation centers on a bill proposed by Reps. John Dingell (D-Michigan) and Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY). The bottom line for this bill is that it focuses on how to ensure that records - including, but not excluded to mental health records -- of prohibited purchasers go into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System in a timely way. The bill would provide resources for states to accomplish this goal - although we don't know at this point how much might be allocated to states. This bill emerged in response to the tragedy at Virginia Tech last April. Also contained in the bill is a provision that would allow for individuals, including thousands of veterans, to petition states to regain their rights to own a firearm. The NRA has pushed for this aspect of the bill, which passed in the U.S. House in June.
As is the case with the Tiahrt Amendment, there are different versions of this bill that have passed in the Senate and the House. As a result, both chambers will have to agree on language before a version of the bill goes to the president. The Senate, for example, added language to its version - but much of it had to do with general school safety issues, not firearms.
The significance of this bill is that it has been portrayed as the first significant piece of federal gun control legislation since legislation banning assault weapons in 1994.
Note: This bill is not an appropriations bill - it is what is called a "substantive" bill. That means Congress is not obligated to deal with it this year.
Illinois
If this bill sounds familiar to people in Illinois who have been following gun control issues, that's not a coincidence. This summer, Illinois became the first state to enact any type of legislation of this nature when the General Assembly passed and Gov. Rod Blagojevich signed SB 0940, which would help ensure that when someone is prohibited from having a firearm due to mental health issues, that information would be reported to the state police in a more expedient way.
Court Case
Court to hear an appeal on a case that was voted on in federal district court earlier this year. That ruling concluded that the gun ban in Washington, D.C. is null and void. This case is significant because if the Supreme Court upholds the lower court's ruling, Chicago and other cities could face pressure to change laws that bar ownership of handguns and assault weapons.
We will keep you updated as developments occur on these and other gun violence prevention issues. If you have any questions or would like more information, please give us a call at 312-341-0939 or 217-744-7383.
August 31, 2007
Governor Blagojevich Signs SB 940 into Law
Earlier today, Governor Blagojevich signed SB 940 into law. This new law will help ensure that information regarding individuals who are prohibited from possessing firearms due to mental health issues would be reported to the state police in a more expedient way. The bill will also require Illinois mental health authorities to share information with the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) about persons who have been barred from buying or owning guns because of mental health issues. Fewer than half of all states -- only 22 -- currently share such information with the federal NICS system.
Please take a moment to call the Governor's office today and ask THANK HIM for signing this bill into law and standing up for gun violence prevention. The number to call is: 217-782-0244.
August 31, 2007
Gun Lobby Loses Key Court Case in Cook County
ICHV is pleased to report that the Circuit Court of Cook County recently rejected a legal challenge to the ban on assault weapons in Cook County. The lawsuit, brought by the Illinois State Rifle Association (ISRA) against the Cook County Board of Commissioners, alleged that the ban on assault weapons "exceeded [the Board's] home rule authority" to enact local ordinances that are stricter than state law.
The Cook County Board passed the ordinance to strengthen the existing ban on assault weapons and high capacity magazines late last year. The ISRA recently challenged the ordinance, but the Circuit Court essentially upheld the ordinance by dismissing the case.
This is good news for gun violence prevention advocates. For the past several years, the gun lobby has been working hard to chip away at state and local law around the nation that place any type of restrictions on the manufacture, sale, possession and use of firearms, including assault weapons and handguns. They have been using their lobbying dollars and political influence to work state legislatures across the country to repeal home rule laws that allow local governments (cities and counties) to pass ordinances that place additional restrictions on firearms. This recent ruling by the Circuit Court of Cook County shows that the gun lobby's strategy is faulty and that there can be reasonable regulations placed on the right to bear arms.
This is a big victory, and we can celebrate that the communities of Cook County will not be havens for assault weapons manufacturers and dealers. This ruling also sends a message that challenges to home rule ordinances can withstand a legal challenge by the gun lobby.
August 2007
Update on Federal Legislation: The Tiahrt Amendment
For the past four years in Congress, legislation making appropriations to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has contained language severely restricting the release of information about guns traced to crime scenes contained in the agency's Firearms Tracing Systems database. This restriction is known as the "Tiahrt Amendment" (named after Rep. Todd Tiahrt, R-Kansas).
The problem with this restriction on crime-gun information is basic: Law enforcement officials, among others, absolutely need this kind of data to do their jobs. The House version of this bill is bad, but the Senate version (from the Senate Appropriations Committee) is even worse when it comes to protecting law enforcement access to crime-gun tracing information.
Despite strong efforts by law enforcement and gun violence prevention groups, an effort to repeal the Tiahrt Amendment was denied this month by the U.S. House of Representatives. However, the two chambers will come together and agree on a version later this year, though that will not happen until the fall.
There is positive news here, however. In terms of reaching Illinois members, our efforts have been successful. Two members of the Illinois delegation who serve on the committee voted for the repeal - Rep. Mark Kirk (R-10th District) and Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-2nd District). In fact, Rep. Kirk was one of only two Republicans who voted against his party on this amendment. People in Illinois should thank these legislators for their support of the repeal.
In the Senate, Sen. Dick Durbin also voted to repeal Tiahrt. The majority of the Illinois House delegation, in fact, as well as both Illinois senators, are on our side. Your calls and efforts in trying to influence members of the Illinois delegation have made a difference.
What This Means for Gun Violence Prevention
Overall, the news about the Tiahrt Amendment tells us that, while we have seen a change in power from Republican to Democratic in Congress, the NRA continues to have significant control over both the Congressional agenda and votes. One reason for this is that only about half of all states have state groups working on gun violence issues, and many of these groups are small and have limited resources and staff to work on the multiple issues that they are facing at any one time. In other words, in half of the country the NRA doesn't get any opposition at all; there is no comprehensive grassroots network to challenge or counter what they say and do in many states, and that is one reason why it is difficult to have an impact at the federal level.
The situation with the Tiahrt Amendment also tells us that there are many members of Congress in both chambers who don't seem to care about the fact that law enforcement agencies around the country, who are on the front lines in fighting gun violence, strongly oppose the Tiahrt amendment and have been working to repeal it.
Even though the Tiahrt amendment was defeated by this House committee, our efforts have led to a collection of allies working together to oppose the Tiahrt amendment on a national level. A number of key legislators, many law enforcement agencies, and more than 200 mayors around the country, led by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, have joined forces to oppose this amendment.
We know from our experience in Illinois that mobilizing on such issues makes a difference. Illinois is one of the only states where the NRA is continuously on the defensive as we push a progressive agenda on gun violence. As we have seen in the Illinois legislature, both this year and in previous years, we are always within a handful of votes from passing key bills.
Other News: Developments at the State Level
Meanwhile in Illinois, an important gun violence bill has gone to the governor and awaits his signature. SB 0940 would help ensure that when someone is prohibited from having a firearm due to mental health issues, that information would be reported to the state police in a more expedient way. The bill would also require Illinois mental health authorities to share information with the National Instant Criminal Background Check System about individuals who have been barred from buying or owning guns because of mental health issues. Fewer than half of all states - only 22 - currently share such information with the federal NICS system.
We urge people to call the governor and voice support for this bill. Just call 217-782-0244.
We will keep you updated as developments occur on these and other gun violence prevention issues. If you have any questions or would like more information, please give us a call at 312-341-0939 or 217-744-7383.
May 14, 2007
Action resumes in Springfield
As you likely have already heard, a tragic shooting took place late last week where a young and promising high school student was shot and killed on a CTA bus. This young student was a relative of ICHV Honorary Board member Michael Robbins, a former Chicago police officer and a victim of gun violence himself. This tragedy shows us not only how important it is for ICHV to continue our important work, but also the value of implementing legislation to make firearms less lethal and accessible to society. In Springfield, some of our legislators have been supporting several bills that would help decrease injury and death caused by firearms in a variety of ways and to help protect our most innocent members of society. Some of the most relevant proposals and updates on activity are included below.
Good news in Senate
Last week, a key bill passed out of the Senate, SB1007, which would prohibit the sale and possession of large capacity ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition.
The bill now moves to the House, and could be heard in committee this week or next week.
One reason this news is especially important is that there was bipartisan support for this bill in the Senate. Another reason why the passage of SB1007, in the Senate is encouraging is simple: this bill would make firearms less deadly by limiting the number of bullets in each magazine to 10 or fewer, thereby reducing the likelihood of exacerbated injury and death.
This bill is especially timely because some of the deadliest shootings in this country, including the tragedy at Virginia Tech, have been committed with weapons that were equipped with high capacity magazines.
We should also emphasize a key point about firearms in relation to this bill. There is a misconception among some people that handguns would not be affected by this bill. That is completely false. As we have seen in numerous recent tragedies, handguns can often hold magazines with more than 10 rounds of ammunition, and such firearms would be subjected to the requirements of this bill when it passes.
Simply put, regardless of what kind of weapon is used-whether military-style assault weapons or handguns-more people are killed or wounded because these large capacity magazines are available.
One final note about SB1007, and similar attempts to reduce access to high capacity ammunition magazines: in the past, some members of the gun industry have claimed that this kind of bill would hurt their business or even force them to leave the state.
Let's face it. Regardless of any law such as this passing in any state, the gun industry has continued to survive, if not thrive. We can safely describe concerns that this bill will hurt the gun industry as nonsense.
Update on House Activity
In the House last week, we thought there might be action on two key bills, but neither was called for a vote because the House spent all of Wednesday and most of Thursday hearing testimony on the gross receipts tax issue.
The two bills we are referring to are:
HB0758, which would require criminal background checks on all handgun sales and
HB1696, which would require reporting of lost and stolen guns.
We believe that one or both of these bills will be voted on in the near future and could possibly be voted on this week. Please contact your legislator to voice your support for these bills. For information about how to reach your legislator, go to www.ilga.org and
click on "House" and "Members."
Let's keep in mind that this is a two-year General Assembly. While we do not know with certainty when these bills would be voted on, the first important step in the process is for them to be voted out of the House.
Gun lobby bill still short of votes
HB1304, a bill that would allow the carrying of concealed, loaded handguns in public places, is still short of the number of votes it needs to pass out of the House.
The deadline for voting on this bill continues to be extended. We strongly encourage you to weigh in on this legislation. Call your legislator and remind him or her that you oppose allowing individuals to carry loaded, hidden handguns in public.
We will keep you updated as developments occur on these issues. If you have any questions or would like more information, please call our office at 312-341-0939 or 217-744-7383.
April 9, 2007
Recess for Legislators
The General Assembly went on recess on March 30th. The Senate will return on April 18th; the House will return on April 17. Once the General Assembly returns, the attention for the immediate future will turn to the House until about April 27th - the date of the third reading deadline in the House.
Deadline Extended for Key Bills in Senate
Prior
to the recess, a lot of work was done by ICHV in support of the assault weapons
bill (SB016) and .50 caliber sniper rifle bill (SB1471) in the Senate. Due
to various reasons, a few key supporters were not able to make it to Springfield
for a vote, including Senate President Emil Jones and other legislators who
were absent.
Since we know that the difference between a bill passing and failing can
be one vote, it is too much of a risk to call a vote on a bill when you
don't have all your supporters there. So, sponsors of these two pieces
of legislation made a decision to postpone votes on these bills, and the
deadline for voting on them has been extended. Since the deadline for these
bills to be considered is now May 31, we fully expect to have our say on
these important measures before the end of this legislative session.
It is worth noting, by the way, that these two measures were hardly the
only measures for which a deadline was extended. Hundreds of bills had
their deadlines extended, simply because there was not enough time to take
up all of these bills before March 30th.
House of Representatives
In the House, there are a number of
bills to watch. We have talked about these bills in previous Legislative Updates.
Here's a quick recap:
- HB0731 -Storage
of Firearms. Bill would raise age of minors who have access to stored firearms
from 14 to 18.
- HB0758 -
Requires that all handgun sales would be subject to criminal background checks.
- HB0796 -
Requires that all handgun dealers in the state of Illinois be licensed at
the state level.
- HB0873 -
Prohibits the possession and sale of assault weapons.
- HB1696 -
Requires that a lost or stolen gun be reported to local law enforcement.
- HB1078 -
Prohibits sales of handguns to one handgun in a 30-day period.
All of these measures are alive in the House of Representatives and will likely be heard between April 17 and April 27.
Many Bills Dealing with Gun Violence Issues
Without a doubt, many people are familiar with efforts to pass bills that prohibit military-style assault weapons in Illinois. It is important to emphasize that other bills - including the other five House bills listed above - are just as important when it comes to attacking the problem of gun violence.
Legislation to prohibit assault weapons can be challenging to pass for a few reasons. Proposals to ban certain classes of weapons target the heart of the gun industry. When that happens, the gun lobby often responds by saying that one proposed ban will only lead to another, and that any type of weapons ban criminalizes legal firearm ownership. That claim is not true, but they use it to build their case.
Now, consider the other end of the spectrum, for example, a bill to require criminal background checks on all handguns sales in Illinois. In regards to this legislation, it is more difficult for the gun lobby to oppose it when they also say that they want to keep criminals from getting easy access to guns.
The point is some bills are harder for the gun lobby to argue against than others, but many of these pieces of legislation can have an immediate impact on reducing gun violence, regardless of whether they get as much publicity as other measures. Several of these proposed bills can help reduce gun violence by, for example, ensuring that prohibited gun purchasers do not get easy access to handguns, by bringing more pressure on problem dealers who supply a higher number of guns traced to crimes, and by helping law enforcement authorities do their job when it comes to tracing guns and dealing with gun crime investigations.
Research Shows Public Support for Changes in Gun Laws
Important measures supported by ICHV are supported by the public, according to a statewide survey conducted by the Legal Community Against Violence (and cited by the Illinois Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence) in February of this year. People polled for the research were registered voters in Illinois.
Key findings showed that:
- 86% of those polled would strongly favor requiring gun owners to inform law enforcement if any of their guns are lost or stolen
- 85% would strongly favor requiring a state license for handgun dealers
- 82% would strongly favor requiring gun owners to lock their guns if there are children under the age of 18 in the household.
Meanwhile, 69% of those polled said they would strongly favor banning the sale and possession of semi-automatic assault weapons as well as the sale and possession of powerful, military-grade 50-caliber sniper rifles.
Clearly, there is major support for strong measures that would help us prevent gun violence.
We will keep you updated as developments occur on these issues. If you have any questions or would like more information, please give us a call at 312-341-0939.
Bills supported by ICHV
One new bill that has come up for support in the House is HB1696. The bill says that if a person fails to report the loss or theft of a firearm, he could lose his FOID (Firearm Owners ID) Card and be charged with a petty offense. When information about the loss or theft of a firearm is properly reported to a law enforcement agency, that can greatly aid an investigation. This bill passed out of committee on Wednesday, March 7 and is now on the House floor.
Two other House measures that we support also moved out of committee this week:
HB3633 - This bill would require that a FOID Card be revoked when individuals are served an order of protection.
HB0796 - Handgun Dealer Licensing Act. Handgun dealers would be licensed by the Department of State Police. A Senate version of the bill, SB1399, is still in committee.
Now that these bills are on the House floor, you can make your feelings know to your representative about why they should support these bills. If
you don't know who your legislator is, go to http://www.ilga.gov/ (the home
page for the Illinois General Assembly), and then go to "Legislative Lookup," on
the bottom right corner of the page.
Meanwhile, all other bills supported by ICHV have been assigned to committees in the state legislature, and we expect them to be heard in the next couple of weeks.
We are cautiously optimistic that we will see these bills move out of committee. They include:
HB0731 - Storage of Firearms. Bill would raise age at which minors can have access to stored firearms from 14 to 18.
HB0758 - Firearm Owners Identification Card Act. Requires universal background checks on all handgun sales.
HB0873 - Assault Weapons. Bill details broad measures prohibiting possession, sale, manufacture, delivery or purchase of assault weapons. A Senate bill on this issue (SB016) is
also being considered (See "Senate bills," below, for more).
HB1078 - Bill would prohibit multiple sales of handguns within a 30-day period. In the Senate, SB102, a version of the same bill, is also being considered. Both the House and Senate bills are currently in committee.
Senate Bills: Assault Weapons Ban Bill Moves to Senate Floor
We had some very good news come out of a Senate committee this week.
SB016-- the Senate version of the assault weapons ban, was passed out of committee and now moves to the Senate floor.
Other news in the Senate:
SB1471 - Prohibits sale, manufacture, purchase, possession, or carrying of 50 caliber sniper rifles. This bill is still in committee.
Pro-Gun lobby bills
Conceal and Carry
We would like to call attention to a pair
of "conceal carry" bills sponsored by the gun lobby - HB1304 and HB1320.
Illinois is one of only two states in the country that does not allow the carrying of concealed weapons. We want to get the word out about these bills to raise awareness of the kind of legislation the gun lobby is eager to pass.
HB1304 - This bill establishes statewide, uniform standards for the issuance of permits to carry concealed firearms in this State. In essence, more citizens would be able to carry concealed guns.
HB1320 -
This "conceal carry" bill would authorize the county sheriff to issue concealed
firearms permits to Judges, State's Attorneys, Assistant State's Attorneys,
Public Defenders, and Assistant Public Defenders.
Why oppose these conceal and carry bills?
The problem we have with these bills is very basic: the more concealed guns there are in society, the greater the chance will be that they lead to gun death or injury.
We should add that at certain points, the gun lobby may try to create the impression that there has been a groundswell among judges and state's attorneys and other citizens to carry concealed weapons. In reality, there is a very small number of people who support this legislation.
Preemption
HB0704 - This bill would invalidate local ordinances and resolutions that regulate firearms legal for hunting under the Wildlife Code.
This bill is on third reading in the Illinois House. An identical Senate bill, SB0458, has also been introduced.
HB1757 - Transportation of weapons. This bill would invalidate any local ordinance that regulates the transportation of weapons. A Senate version of the bill, SB0721, has also been introduced.
Note: Preemption bills need a three-fifths majority to pass.
Why oppose?
A preemption bill like this one would prevent municipalities from regulating weapons - including assault weapons. Even if this bill does not pass, it serves as an example of the type of legislation the gun lobby will try to pass.
Changes to Firearm Owners Identification Card Act
HB1606 - This bill would amend the law to say that a person 18 years of age or older may apply for a Firearm Owner's Identification Card without the consent of a parent of legal guardian (currently, persons between 18 and 21 must have the consent of a parent or legal guardian to obtain a card).
Why oppose?
People between the ages of 18 and 21 have a higher rate of gun-related accidents. This bill would make guns more easily accessible to this group. In addition, while individuals in Illinois need to be 21 to obtain a handgun, they only need to be 18 to have access to an assault weapon. Do we really want to make assault weapons available to these individuals?
Click here for a list of additional bills up for consideration.
What's next?
The month of March should be a very active one on gun issues in Illinois. We will be in touch again soon.
For more
information, give us a call at 312-341-0939. To see a synopsis of any bill,
go to ilga.org and click on "Bills & Resolutions" (under Legislation & Laws,
at the top of the page).
Plus: For more information on how to contact members of the General Assembly, you can also go to http://www.ilga.gov/ and
click on "House" or "Senate" members.
We will keep you updated as developments occur on these issues. If you have any questions or would like more information, please give us a call at 312-341-0939.
Can you make a difference?
The short
answer to that question is a resounding "Yes." We say that not only because we need your support - but because of what is happening with key bills in Springfield. In most cases, key pieces of gun legislation are only a handful of votes short of passing in the Illinois House and Senate at this time. Our challenge is to find these votes. Many "swing" votes
in the House and Senate will be legislators who serve Cook County and various
collar counties.
More Bills that can have an impact
Here is a short list of some additional bills being considered that can 1) make it harder for people to get access to handguns and 2) make it easier to put bad apple gun dealers out of business.
House bills to keep in mind:
HB0731 - Storage of Firearms. Bill would raise age of minors who have access to stored firearms from 14 to 18.
HB0758 - Firearm Owners Identification Card Act. Requires universal background checks on all handgun sales.
HB0796 - Handgun Dealer Licensing Act. Handgun dealers would be licensed by the Department of State Police.
HB0873 - Assault Weapons. Bill details broad measures prohibiting possession, sale, manufacture, delivery or purchase of assault weapons.
HB1078 - Bill would prohibit multiple sales of handguns within a 30-day period.
Senate bills:
SB1471 - Prohibits sale, manufacture, purchase, possession, or carrying of 50 caliber sniper rifles.
Bills promoted by the NRA/gun lobby:
HB0228 - Shortens period of time gun owner must keep record of gun transfer. This bill reflects a pattern of the gun lobby to support legislation that would destroy gun records.
HB0704 - Firearms preemption. This is the gun lobby's way of preempting an assault weapons ban.
HB1304 - Carrying concealed firearms. This bill would allow the carrying of concealed, loaded handguns in public places.
Who should you contact?
To find
out how to contact members of the General Assembly, go to House or Senate
at http://www.ilga.gov/ and click on "Members." Calls, faxes and letters
to our legislators make a difference. When you contact them, you can also
ask for their email address.
What happens in Illinois is key!
Why pay attention to what is happening in Springfield these days on handgun issues? There are many reasons - but one reason is certainly that states, including Illinois, are in a better position that our federal government to address handgun violence. Based on how Congress has debated - or failed to debate - issues related to handgun violence in recent years, we are confident that states like Illinois are more likely to make a difference. If we want to make positive changes to gun laws, we need to make those changes on a statewide level.
Resources for contacting
your elected officials and researching public policy information
Illinois General
Assembly
This is the official website for the Illinois General Assembly. Through it,
you can access your elected officials in the Illinois House or Senate, find
information on current or past legislation, and get information about votes
on specific bills.
U.S. Senate
This is the official website for the United States Senate. Here, you can access
your Senators' websites, find voting records on specific bills, and track
legislation.
U.S. House
of Representatives
This is the official website for the United States House of Representatives.
Here, you can access your Congressman's website, find voting records on specific
bills, and track legislation.
Thomas Website--
U.S. Congress on the net
This is the official Library of Congress website for the U.S. Congress. It
contains links to a plethora of information, including legislation, House and
Senate schedules, voting records, basic information on the legislative process,
and other information.
Back to top
Back to home page